Choosing from the range of static application security testing, or SAST, tools available in the market to find the right one can be a hard task. The desire to identify and address security issues before applications hit production is clear, but choosing the ideal tool remains a challenge.
Fear not, as I’ve got you covered! Drawing from my extensive experience working with various development teams and projects, I’ve explored numerous SAST tools. In this article, I’ll simplify your decision-making process and help you choose the best one for your company.
Get ready for insights into my personal experiences with different tools and my top picks for the 10 best SAST tools in 2024. Whether you’re a seasoned professional or new to the field, this guide will help you make an informed choice in enhancing your application security.
After a comprehensive analysis of each tool, these are the 10 best SAST tools in 2024 that you can get to ensure a secured application development lifecycle.
Continue reading to get in-depth knowledge of the SAST tools mentioned above. Let’s get started!
What is Static Application Security Testing (SAST)?
SAST is a security testing tool that analyzes the source code of an application for vulnerabilities without executing the program. This testing method is performed during the development phase of the software development lifecycle. The primary goal of SAST is to identify security issues early in the development process, allowing developers to address and fix them before the application goes into production.
By analyzing the code statically, without running the application, SAST tools can catch potential vulnerabilities such as code injection, insecure dependencies, and other security flaws that might pose risks to the application’s security.
What are SAST tools?
SAST tools, categorized as “white box” tools, are used in early software development stages to implement static application security testing. The biggest positive that SAST tools provide you with is their ability to operate on applications without them functioning.
This enables development teams to refine new features that they are about to include in an application.
This approach also ensures timely identification and remediation of security issues, preventing resources from getting wasted. By detecting vulnerabilities in the initial development phase, SAST tools mitigate application-breaking bugs and security concerns.
These tools offer developers means to continuously test applications, enabling the ongoing identification and remediation of security vulnerabilities before application deployment.
How to choose the best SAST tool?
By now, you should be aware of the importance of SAST tools in your organization to enhance the overall security posture of your applications.
However, it is quite a daunting task to pick the best one for your enterprise looking at the wide range of options that the market has to offer. Based on my personal experiences, I have picked some key features for you that you should check in a SAST solution before getting one.
Static Analysis
SAST tools perform static analysis of the application code, examining it without executing the program. This allows them to identify potential security issues by analyzing the code structure, logic, and data flows.
Early Detection
SAST is applied during the development phase, enabling early detection of security vulnerabilities. This approach helps in fixing issues before they become critical in a production environment.
Code Review
SAST tools facilitate automated code review by scanning the entire codebase for known patterns and security risks. This helps developers identify and understand potential security threats within the code.
Security Best Practices
SAST tools check the code against established security best practices and coding standards. They identify deviations from these standards, helping developers adhere to secure coding practices.
Vulnerability Identification
SAST tools can identify a range of vulnerabilities, including but not limited to code injection, insecure dependencies, cryptographic issues, and other common security flaws.
Integration with Development Workflow
Many SAST tools integrate seamlessly into the development workflow, allowing developers to run scans from their IDEs or through continuous integration pipelines.
False Positive Management
SAST tools often provide mechanisms to manage false positives, allowing developers to focus on genuine security issues and reduce the noise generated by the tool.
CloudDefense.AI
CloudDefense.AI 
World’s Top CNAPP that Secures from Hacker Recon to Cloud to Your Code
CloudDefense.AI is a top-notch CNAPP in the world that follows all the recommendations laid down by Gartner. CloudDefense.AI’s SAST solution makes it easy to build collaboration between multiple teams and create a secure development environment for your software.
Features
CloudDefense.AI is a top-notch CNAPP in the world that follows all the recommendations laid down by Gartner. CloudDefense.AI’s SAST solution makes it easy to build collaboration between multiple teams and create a secure development environment for your software.
Deeper SAST Analysis
CloudDefense.AI stands out by digging deeper into code with advanced analysis. Unlike traditional tools, it scans both application and library code, uncovering hidden vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies. It’s like having a security guard for every nook and cranny of your software.
Multiple Language Support
CloudDefense.AI's SAST tool boasts extensive language support, ensuring complete security analysis for 20 programming languages. The supported languages include: C, C++, Docker, .NET, Go, Java, JavaGradle, JavaMaven, Kotlin, Kubernetes, JavaScript, Objective-C, PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust, Scala, Secrets, Swift, Terraform.
Automated Remediation
CloudDefense.AI doesn’t just find issues; it fixes them for you. With Automated Remediation, it suggests precise code fixes for vulnerabilities. Approve changes effortlessly, speeding up the process and letting you focus on building, not fixing.
Early Detection, Easy Integration
Discover vulnerabilities in real time before your code even hits production. CloudDefense.AI scales effortlessly across languages and integrates seamlessly into your existing setup. It’s the all-in-one security suite that fits right into your development workflow.
Automated Code Scanning
CloudDefense.AI’s automated scanning takes the manual effort out of security. It rapidly scans large volumes of code, saving time and costs. By automating the process, it enhances security, identifies issues early, and provides actionable insights for continuous improvement.
Compliance Made Simple
CloudDefense.AI doesn’t just keep your code secure; it keeps your auditors happy too. Detailed reports ensure compliance with industry standards like OWASP and CWE. Plus, it speaks the language of developers, making security collaboration a breeze. Proactive security enhancement is just the cherry on top.
Pros
Easily integrates with your existing infrastructure and other security tools.
The graphical interface makes it easy to track vulnerabilities.
The platform is very easy to use and non-technical staff can handle the interface as well.
Other security tools are available on the same platform, you can receive a complete security solution from a single vendor.
Aftersales service is great and they reply promptly.
Suggests the best way to remediate security issues in your code.
No compromises in execution speed
Cons
Can be complex at first, but easier to use after.
Don’t just take our word for it. Book a demo and witness firsthand the power and simplicity of CloudDefense.AI.
GitHub
GitHub 
2nd Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
GitHub, a platform used for code collaboration, has gone way beyond code repository hosting. Its security features have begun to empower developers to identify and fix security issues in real time. GitHub offers free and tiered accounts, and while advanced security features are billable for enterprise accounts, they remain free for public repositories.
Pros
Allows scheduling code scanning during pull or push requests for efficient code review.
Offers personal, organizational, and enterprise account tiers with varied features.
Free for public repositories, while advanced security features are billable for enterprise accounts.
Cons
Advanced security features require a license for enterprise accounts.
Billing is primarily per-user for GitHub Team and GitHub Enterprise.
Additional enterprise features may require reaching out to GitHub’s sales team for pricing quotes.
SonarQube
SonarQube
3rd Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
SonarQube goes beyond mere bug and vulnerability detection. Its community edition provides useful features, including code smell tracking, technical debt reviews, and comprehensive code quality metrics. SonarQube enhances code quality history and allows real-time IDE notifications for injection flaws.
Pros
SonarQube offers a free community edition, making it accessible for developers looking to enhance code quality without added costs.
The tool provides real-time IDE notifications, ensuring developers are promptly informed about potential issues during the coding process.
Cons
While supporting an extensive range of languages, there might be niche languages that SonarQube does not cover.
The on-premises delivery model might require additional setup and maintenance compared to cloud-based solutions.
Veracode
Veracode
4th Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
Veracode offers automated security feedback seamlessly integrated into CI/CD pipelines and IDEs. Boasting a robust suite of features, it covers software composition analysis, security management, audit trail, and comprehensive reporting.
Pros
Veracode integrates with a wide array of CI/CD tools, promoting a cohesive development and security ecosystem.
Automated CI/CD pipeline feedback enables early identification and resolution of security issues.
Cons
Veracode's robust feature set may come with a higher cost, which could be a consideration for smaller teams or organizations with budget constraints
The depth of features and capabilities may pose a learning curve for new users, potentially impacting the speed of adoption.
Organizations not heavily reliant on CI/CD workflows might find some features less relevant.
Fortify Static Code Analyser
Fortify Static Code Analyser
5th Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
Fortify is another solution that offers an array of features to fortify code security. With build tools, IDE security notifications, bug tracking, and code repository scanning, it caters to diverse needs in the development lifecycle.
Pros
Fortify integrates seamlessly with a variety of development tools, fostering a cohesive development and security environment.
The inclusion of gamified training encourages developers to adopt secure coding practices, enhancing the overall security culture.
Cons
The depth of features in Fortify may present a learning curve for new users, impacting the speed of adoption.
The feature set may come with a higher cost, which could be a consideration for smaller teams or organizations with budget constraints.
Organizations not heavily reliant on CI/CD workflows might find some features less relevant, potentially leading to underutilization.
Checkmarx CxSAST
Checkmarx CxSAST
6th Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
Checkmarx CxSAST stands out as a dynamic static code analyzer, specializing in identifying source code errors, security lapses, and compliance issues without the need for code compilation. It constructs a logical code graph, employing preconfigured queries to pinpoint security vulnerabilities and business logic problems.
Pros
The non-compilation-based analysis eliminates the need for code build or compilation, streamlining the scanning process.
Seamless integration with popular IDEs enhances the user experience, facilitating efficient code analysis within developers' familiar environments.
Cons
The depth of features in CxSAST may pose a learning curve for new users.
The robust feature set may come with a higher cost, which could be a consideration for smaller teams or organizations with budget constraints.
While offering extensive integration, configuring multiple tools might introduce complexity for some users.
Snyk
Snyk
7th Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
Pros
Snyk's approach covers the entire code base, addressing proprietary and open-source components, containers, and cloud infrastructure.
The platform's proprietary engine offers immediate suggestions for improving and securing code development, fostering proactive vulnerability management.
Cons
The depth of features in Snyk may pose a learning curve for new users.
While compatible with various tools and environments, configuring multiple integrations might introduce complexity for some users.
Mend SAST
Mend SAST
8th Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
Mend SAST, formerly known as WhiteSource, stands as a dynamic solution enabling DevOps teams to conduct in-depth security analyses of application source code without compromising speed. With a focus on alleviating the burden of application security, Mend SAST facilitates the production of high-quality and secure code by developers.
Pros
Ideal for enterprise applications, catering to the security needs of complex and large-scale software projects.
Provides built-in data governance, supporting a variety of infrastructural needs, including on-premise, cloud, or hybrid solutions.
Highlights specific code changes required to address flaws in the code, streamlining the remediation process.
Cons
Teams edition requires a minimum of 20 developers per year, potentially limiting usability for smaller teams.
The Enterprise edition is designed for a minimum of 40 developers per year, with pricing starting at $32,000, which might be substantial for smaller enterprises.
New users may face difficulties, especially regarding the specific features and capabilities of Mend SAST.
Codiga
Codiga
9th Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
Codiga emerges as a highly scalable Static Analysis (SAST) tool, prioritizing faster code development by enabling the early detection of quality defects. Embracing the left-shift coding philosophy, it empowers DevSecOps and QA teams to identify issues early in the software development cycle, automating code reviews with context-based suggestions.
Pros
Identifies vulnerabilities and coding problems during pull requests, addressing issues like code duplicates and outdated dependencies.
Enhances productivity for developers working on multiple computers and platforms.
Offers source code scanning, workflow management, quality assurance, application security, and collaboration tools and serves as a continuous integration tool for CI pipelines.
Cons
The Teams tier, priced at $14/month for software engineering teams, may incur costs for larger teams.
The abundance of features may overwhelm users seeking a more streamlined solution.
Integration into existing workflows may require thorough consideration of compatibility and dependencies.
GitLab
GitLab
10th Easiest To Use in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) software
GitLab stands as a versatile platform, empowering users to construct modern applications and expedite digital transformation through automated processes that facilitate swift code delivery. Beyond serving as a code repository and version control tool, GitLab integrates built-in DevOps workflows, including continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines.
Pros
Offers a comprehensive solution with the code repository, version control, and integrated DevOps workflows.
Streamlines development with built-in CI/CD pipelines, enhancing collaboration and reducing cycle time.
Free for individual users, providing essential tools without financial constraints.
The Premium edition, priced at $19/user/month, targets enhanced team productivity and coordination.
The Ultimate tier, at $99/user/month, caters to organization-wide needs, focusing on security, planning, and compliance.
Cons
The breadth of features may pose a challenge for new users seeking a more straightforward solution.
Users looking for a minimalistic solution may find the abundance of features overwhelming.
Integrating GitLab into existing workflows requires careful consideration of compatibility and potential disruptions.
Achieving widespread adoption across an organization may require dedicated efforts and training.
SAST Solution Comparison
There are a ton of SAST tools available in the market offered by some very well-known vendors. It can be difficult for the best of us to pick the right one that can easily integrate itself with our existing systems.
| Tools | Focus Area | Key Features | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| CloudDefense.AI | Cloud Security | 1. SAST Solution 2. Integrates with existing infrastructure 3. Graphical interface 4. Non-technical staff friendly 5. Comprehensive security solution |
Contact for pricing or Book a FREE Demo |
| GitHub | Code Collaboration, Security | 1. Code repository 2. Version control 3. Enhanced team productivity 4. Free for individuals 5. Paid tiers for additional features |
Free for individuals, Paid tiers: $44/user/year, $231/user/year |
| SonarQube | Code Quality and Security Analysis | 1. Bug and Vulnerability Detection 2. Code Smell Tracking and Reviews 3. Integration with CI/CD Workflows |
Contact for pricing |
| Veracode | Comprehensive Application Security | 1. Automated Security Feedback 2. Manual Penetration Testing System 3. Vulnerability Alerts and Licensing Mgmt |
Contact for pricing |
| Fortify Static Code Analyser | Secure Coding and Code Analysis | 1. IDE Security Notifications 2. Audit Assistant for Manual Auditing 3. Vulnerability Coverage |
Contact for pricing |
| Checkmarx CxSAST | Static Code Analysis and Vulnerability Management | 1. Static Code Analysis with Custom Queries 2. CI/CD Integration with Extensive Language Support 3. Custom Query Configuration |
Contact for pricing |
| Snyk | Developer-Centric Security | 1. Comprehensive Code Security 2. In-Workflow Security Integration 3. Developer-centric Advice |
Contact for pricing |
| Mend SAST | Static Analysis, Automated Remediation | 1. Static analysis for source code 2. Automated remediation 3. Built-in data governance 4. Ideal for enterprise applications |
Teams: $12,000/year for 20 developers, Enterprise: $32,000/year for 40 developers |
| Codiga | Static Analysis, Automated Code Review | 1. Highly scalable static analysis tool 2. Automated code reviews 3. Coding Assistant for code snippet management |
Free version, Teams: $14/month for software engineering teams |
| GitLab | Code Collaboration, DevOps | 1. Code repository 2. Version control 3. CI/CD pipelines 4. Enhanced team productivity 5. Free for individuals 6. Paid tiers for additional features |
Free for individuals, Paid tiers: $19/user/month, $99/user/month |
Please note that pricing information is subject to change, and it’s recommended to check with the respective companies for the most up-to-date pricing details.
Conclusion
Application security should be of high priority at the moment for all companies involved in developing one. In this case, the addition of a SAST tool to your application security arsenal is irreplaceable. Undoubtedly, the significance of choosing the right SAST tool cannot be overstated by me, given the multitude of tools available in the market. It remains important to consider the key points laid down by me in this blog to help you choose the right one for yourself.
Drawing from my experience working with a range of security tools throughout my career, I have made your search easier with the top ten in the market. However, it is up to you to decide which one goes best with your organization’s development cycle. Choose wisely to ensure a secure development environment.
Anshu Bansal, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur and venture capitalist, currently co-founds CloudDefense.AI, a cybersecurity solution with a mission to secure your business by rapidly identifying and removing critical risks in Applications and Infrastructure as Code. With a background in Amazon, Microsoft, and VMWare, they contributed to various software and security roles.
